Financial Analysis Management Assignment Help

Financial Analysis Management Assignment Help 

1.   Your question isas follows:

You work as a Financial Analyst for Ahmad, Khan and Lek, a firm of acquisition consultants. The firm has been approached by a large international chemical company which is considering the acquisition of a Malaysian chemical manufacturing company, the Chemical Company of Malaysia Berhad (CCM), to help provide it with a greater geographical coverage in South East Asia. The chemical company’s client company has approached Ahmad, Khan and Lek for an independent analysis of the Chemical Company of Malaysia (CCM), in terms of all aspects of its recent financial performance. Read more : Project Management Methodology Assignment Part 1:You are asked to undertake an analysis and review of CCM’s area of business together with a critical comparative evaluation of its financial risks and financial performanceover the two years: 2013 and 2014. Your analysis should conclude with a recommendation, with reasonsas to whether thecompany might make a good acquisition for your client from a financial standpoint.The outcome of your analysis should be produced in a report format that is suitable for presentation to the client.

2.   Presentation

·         A consultant’s report should becl early and logically structured in what ever format that appears to be the most suitable for supporting the analysis,arguments,conclusions and recommendations. Undertake ratio calculations in an appendix and present only the actual ratios in the body of the report. ·         The investment appraisal article may be written in any format that you think is appropriate. Once again, place any calculations that you may wish to use in an appendix to the article. ·         Tables,graphs and charts area convenient way of organising your findings and presenting data.  They also make it easier for the client(and the examiner) tounder stand your findings and so you are recommended to use visual aids where appropriate.

 General Guidelines:

1. Your answers to the questions should be appropriately analysed and must be grounded in appropriate academic literature and must provide clear evidence of independent critical evaluation.
2. Students exceeding the word limit will be penalised.
3. Poor presentation of your written content including spelling mistakes, grammatical errors, poor sentence structure, paragraphing etc. will be penalised
4. All assignments must be word processed. Handwritten assignments will attract an automatic FAIL grade. Please use font type Times New Roman, Font size 12 and double-spaced.
5. Assignments will be graded on the basis of research project done, analysis of the facts collated, stand taken and the justification of the stand.
6. All research must be referenced based on Harvard Referencing. Improper or lack of either of these constitutes plagiarism and students will be awarded a Zero.
7. Students found copying from other students will also be charged with collusion and awarded a Zero.

3.  Assessment Requirements:

The submission of your work assessment should be organised and clearly structured in a report format. Maximum word length allowed is 2200 words, excluding words in the charts & tables and in the appendixes section of your assignment. This assignment is worth 100% of the final assessment of the module. Students are required to submit a type-written document in Microsoft Word format with Times New Roman font type, size 12 and line spacing 1.5. Indicate the sources of information environment and literature review by including all the necessary citations and references adopting the Harvard Referencing System. Students who have been found to have committed acts of Plagiarism are automaticallyconsidered to have failed the entire module. If found to have breached the regulation for the second time, you will be asked to leave the course. Plagiarism involves taking someone else’s words, thoughts, ideas or essays from online essay banks and trying to pass them off as your own. It is a form of cheating which is taken very seriously.

4. Marking Scheme:

	Max. Word Limit	Marks (%)
A critical, comparative evaluation of the financial risks and financial performance of the CCM group over the two years 2013 and 2014	2000	45
Recommendation(s), with reasons, as to whether CCM would make a suitable acquisition for your chemical company client.	200	10

5.  Learning Outcomes tested in this assignment

Upon successful completion of this module the student will be able to:

1.     Demonstrate a critical awareness, comprehension and synthesis of both a business and an industry, together with its future prospects. 2.    Identify, organise, analyse and critically evaluate financial information, articulate conclusions and form recommendation(s), based on a disciplined, thoughtful and well-structured appraisal of the evidence and founded on clear theoretical underpinnings. 3.    Structure and communicate ideas based on an understanding and appreciation of the practical application of key issues and theories in Corporate Financial Management. 4.    Display an ability to evaluate complex business issues, synthesize concepts and to formulate and propose advice based on informed judgement. 5.    Articulate conclusions and make recommendations, in an independent manner, which are based on informed analysis and critical appraisal.

6.  Notes on Plagiarism

Plagiarism is passing off the work of others as your own. This constitutes academic theft and is a serious matter which is penalized in the assignment marking. Plagiarism is the submission of an item of assessment containing elements of work produced by another person(s) in such a way that it could be assumed to be the student’s own work. Examples of plagiarism are: The verbatim copying of another person’s work without acknowledgement. The close paraphrasing of another person’s work by simply changing a few words or altering the order of presentation without acknowledgement. The unacknowledged quotation of phrases from another person’s work and/or the presentation of another person’s idea(s) as one’s own. Copying or close paraphrasing with occasional acknowledgement of the source may also be deemed to be plagiarism as the absence of quotation marks implies that the phraseology is the student’s own. Plagiarised work may belong to another student or be from a published source such as a book, report, journal or material available on the internet.

7. Harvard Referencing

The structure of a citation under the Harvard referencing system is the author’s surname, year of publication, and page number or range, in parentheses,  as follows: The page number or page range is omitted if the entire work is cited. The author’s surname is omitted if it appears in the text. Thus we may say: “Jones (2001) revolutionized the field of trauma surgery.” Two or three authors are cited using “and” or “&”: (Deane, Smith, and Jones, 1991) or (Deane, Smith & Jones, 1991). More than three authors are cited using et al. (Deane et al. 1992).

An unknown date is cited as no date (Deane n.d.). A reference to a reprint is cited with the original publication date in square brackets (Marx [1867] 1967, p. 90). If an author published two books in 2005, the year of the first (in the alphabetic order of the references) is cited and referenced as 2005aand the second as 2005b. A citation is placed wherever appropriate in or after the sentence. If it is at the end of a sentence, it is placed before the period, but a citation for an entire block quote immediately follows the period at the end of the block since the citation is not an actual part of the quotation itself. Complete citations are provided in the alphabetical order in a section following the text usually designated as “Works cited” or “References”. The difference between a “works cited” or “references” list and a bibliography is that a bibliography may include works not directly cited in the text. All citations are in the same font as the main text. Examples of book references are: Smith, J. (2005a). Dutch Citing Practices. The Hague: Holland Research Foundation. Smith, J. (2005b). Harvard Referencing. London: Jolly Good Publishing. In giving the city of publication, an internationally well-known city (such as London, The Hague, or New York) is referenced as the city alone. If the city is not internationally well known, the country (or state and country if in the U.S.) is given. Examples of journal references are: Smith, John Maynard. “The origin of altruism,” Nature 393, 1998, pp. 639-40. Bowcott, Owen. “Street Protest”, The Guardian,October 18, 2005, accessed February 7, 2006. Order Now