Project Risk Management-Btechnd
Project Risk Management-Btechnd
| Non-compliant | Poor/inadequate | Basic | Adequate | Good | Excellent | Mark | |
| ASSIGNMENT REQUIREMENTS (out of 60) | 0 | 0 to 44 | 45 to 58 | 59 to 67 | 68 to 76 | 77 to 90 | /90 |
| 1. Describe the organisational and project context for which you are preparing the annotated bibliography | No description is provided. | The description of the organisational and project context is poor. | The description of the organisational and project context is basic. | The description of the organisational and project context is adequate and permits some understanding of the context. | The description of the organisational and project context is good and permits an understanding of the context. | The description of the organisational and project context is excellent and permits a full understanding of the context. | |
| 2. Annotated blibliographies | |||||||
| A full reference of each artefact that is to be reviewed at the commencement of the bibliography | The references are not provided. | The references are not correct and/or not complete. | The references are adequate but are not fully correct and/or complete. | The references are complete and comply fully with Harvard AGPS6 | |||
| Explain the articles’ focus or purpose | There is no explanation of the articles’ focus nor purpose.
The resources chosen are not relevant to the topic and the organizational context.
| The explanation of the articles’ focus and purpose is poor.
The resources chosen are not really relevant to the topic and the organizational context.
| The explanation of the articles’ focus and purpose is basic.
The resources chosen are somewhat relevant to the topic and the organizational context.
| The explanation of the articles’ focus and purpose is adequate.
The resources chosen are mostly relevant to the topic and the organizational context.
| The explanation of the articles’ focus and purpose is good.
The resources chosen are relevant to the topic and the organizational context.
| The explanation of the articles’ focus and purpose is excellent.
The resources chosen are highly relevant to the topic and the organizational context.
| |
| Summarise the research approach / method or source of information | There is no summary of the research approach / method nor source of information. | The summary of the research method and/or information sources is poor. | The summary of the research method and/or information sources is basic. | The summary of the research method and/or information sources is adequate. | The summary of the research method and/or information sources is good. | The summary of the research method and/or information sources is excellent. | |
| A critical reflection on the value, reliability, completeness and limitations of the resource. Clearly describe the strengths and weaknesses of the resource. | The critical reflection on the value, reliability, completeness and limitations of the resource is not provided. The discussion on the strengths and weaknesses of the resource is not provided. | The critical reflection on the value, reliability, completeness and limitations of the resource is poor. The discussion on the strengths and weaknesses of the resource is poor. | The critical reflection on the value, reliability, completeness and limitations of the resource is basic. The discussion on the strengths and weaknesses of the resource is basic. | The critical reflection on the value, reliability, completeness and limitations of the resource is adequate. The discussion on the strengths and weaknesses of the resource is adequate. | The critical reflection on the value, reliability, completeness and limitations of the resource is good. Some gaps are indicated. The discussion on the strengths and weaknesses of the resource is good. | The critical reflection on the value, reliability, completeness and limitations of the resource is excellent. Gaps are clearly indicated.The discussion on the strengths and weaknesses of the resource is excellent. | |
| Justification of why this resource is important in the context of the development of your PMO’s procedures | The justification of the importance of the resource to the organizational context and project risk management is not provided. | The justification of the importance of the resource to the organizational context and project risk management is poor. | The justification of the importance of the resource to the organizational context and project risk management is basic. | The justification of the importance of the resource to the organizational context and project risk management is adequately argued. | The justification of the importance of the resource to the organizational context and project risk management is well argued. | The justification of the importance of the resource to the organizational context and project risk management is excellently argued. | |
| 3. Conclusions | No conclusion is provided. | The conclusion is poor. | The conclusion is basic. | The conclusion is adequate and is a summative evaluation of the bibliographies. | The conclusion is good and is a good summative evaluation of the bibliographies. | The conclusion is excellent and is a very good summative evaluation of the bibliographies. | |
| Reference list | There is no reference list. | The reference list follows some of the USQ standards but is not complete and/or contains numerous errors. | The reference list follows most of the USQ standards but is not complete and/or contains some errors. | The reference list follows the USQ standards but is not totally complete and/or contains some errors. | The reference list follows the USQ standards and is complete and contains few errors. | The reference list follows the USQ standards and is free from errors. | |
| PRESENTATION OF REPORT (out of 10) | 0 | 0 to 4 | 5 to 7 | 8 to 10 | /10 | ||
| Cover sheet (in addition to the mark sheet) | No cover sheet provided | Limited information provided | Adequate information provided | Comprehensive information provided with no errors nor omissions. | |||
| Table of contents – includes all sections and subsections, list of references, and with page numbering | No table of contents provided | Incorrect or incomplete use of Table of contents | Adequate use of Table of contents | Correct use of table of contents | |||
| Section Numbering – section and sub-section numbering to comply with normal conventions (e.g. set text by Summers & Smith – Communications Skills Handbook) | No section numbering at all | Little or no effective usage of section numbering | Adequate usage of section numbering | Correct usage of section numbering | |||
| Harvard referencing system (including reference list) – is used and conforms to Harvard style as defined on USQ Library website (e.g. alphabetical order) | No use of Harvard referencing system | Poor or inadequate use of Harvard system of referencing | Basic use of Harvard system of referencing | Adequate use of Harvard system | Good use of Harvard system | Comprehensive use of Harvard system in accordance with conventions of AGPS 6 style | |
| Page Numbering – page numbering to comply with normal conventions (e.g. set text by Summers & Smith – Communications Skills Handbook) | No page numbering at all | Incorrect use of page numbering | Adequate use of page numbering | Correct use of page numbering | |||
| Language Skills – grammar, spelling, clear and concise writing style, correct punctuation | Very poor language skills | Poor language skills | Adequate language skills | Excellent language skills | |||
| Word count | Significantly over or under nominated word count | Slightly over or under word count margins (+/- 10%) | Within word count margins | ||||
| * Total Assessment Mark (out of 100) |
/100
|
| Penalties applied to… | Marks to be deducted for… | Range of penalty | Actual deduction |
| Mark sheet – to be attached to front of assignment | No mark sheet | 10 | |
| Turnitin Report – to be submitted with assignment | No Turnitin originality report
(mark of 1/100 allocated until report submitted)
| 10 | |
| ** Total Deducted Mark (TDM) |
